12
In the Vedic Age prior to the Puranic, as pointed
out in these Chronicles, only pure geometry was required for higher
processes. These sacred geometrical structures were called vedi;
commonly translated as altars. But as the Sanskrit word reveals, knowledge
was the essence of those sacred structures.
When darkness set in, similar to Egypt, the Hindu
temple arose and displaced the simple, direct and hallowed vedi.
And they grew in size and grandeur to the monuments we know today. This
was a necessary subterfuge when the Knowledge was forced underground.
But it was nonetheless a diminishing: while the outer form increased
and became more elaborate, the essence, the knowledge
went ever deeper under the coverings that slumber provided. However,
certain aspects were preserved. In analysing them we can now discuss in
greater depth the joint contribution of these two great civilisations.
For example, the question of spatial conquest is revealed as
central to the pre-pharaonic civilisation of Egypt in every aspect of
their extant monuments. But to better appreciate the relationship we
must see this spatial obsession in relation to its true sense which is
a cosmic direction – i.e., EXPANSION. Thus, the very
massiveness of all Egyptian structures, starting with the Sphinx and
Pyramids of Giza down to the later Pharaonic temples and tombs,
indicate that they were consumed with an obsession to somehow leave an imprinting
involving the spatial conquest; or better, to fulfil a destined purpose
as a civilisation involving the principle of expansion. Ancient
Egypt thus fulfilled its part of the bargain which the Sphinx was
prophesying – the Lion half.
On the other hand, Vedic civilisation, while
evolving along similar lines within an identical timeframe, expresses
an obsession with the complimentary cosmic direction, CONTRACTION.
Egypt displayed its spatial obsession through the massive structures it
bequeathed to human civilisation. Nothing in those extant monuments
encourages the psychic experience so central to every Hindu Temple. In
the latter there is a compelling, irresistible contraction that
forces the seeker into his/her innermost central space in an
interiorising drive into the soul. And this is fully expressed in all
Hindu structures. Whereas in any Egyptian monument the exact opposite
is experienced: the aspirant is cosmicised by the sheer
grandeur of their proportions, and, above all, their alignment.
At this point it must be noted that India stands for
the soul of the Earth. The divine Purpose of the existence of this
third planet from the Sun is a psychic evolution, a planet within the
System where the soul can evolve and create a superior manifestation in
a transformed field. This was not Egypt’s task. A partnership is the
call of the hour for reasons which will be made clear.
Also to be noted is that the expansion
induced in the Egyptian monument is not the same as a dissolution into
transcendence of Buddhist structures, or in the Christian Gothic
Cathedrals where the size and opulence force the seeker to experience a
humbling before the overwhelming power of the Creator. In Egypt cosmic
transcendence was never the issue as it is in Buddhism; or else what we
find in the later orthodox religions of the Age of Pisces when
otherworldliness and heavens after death became the sole focus of
worship. Pre-pharaonic Egypt was not obsessed with transcendence but
with the cosmic direction it was called upon to establish on Earth: expansion.
It did not seek to obliterate cosmic existence but to find a harmony
with and within the material universe.
However, this would have little relevance until the
other end of the Sphinx/time-axis had manifested. Unless the principle
of contraction becomes established, the work of expansion
the ancients accomplished will serve to destroy the Earth because what
is demanded is balance, equilibrium, known to the ancients, -
but now a knowledge long lost. This is what must be offered by India as
centre-soul of the Earth.
Next Page
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|