data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7bcd/c7bcd01c25a6718f7535fb5ae4830600cc5005fc" alt="" |
Chronicles
of the Inner Chamber
1 -
Preface
Preface
Those readers of
Matrimandir Action Committee communications who live in India or who
have had contact with Indian culture are very much aware of the fact
that, to quote the Mahamaya, ‘…If the measurement of the temple is
in every way perfect, there is perfection in the universe as well.’(XXII,
92.) It is unthinkable in India to establish a noble endeavour around a
Symbol that is imperfect, flawed; or else distorted purposely or out of
ignorance by impositions of the human ego. For these reasons all sacred
art, sculpture and architecture were anonymously executed to
lessen the prominence of the ego. In the place of honour there
is, traditionally, the highest symbol of perfection, fashioned with
meticulous care particularly in what concerns proportions and
measurements. To stray from those ancient injunctions is unthinkable.
Simply put, this perfect form then generates an atmosphere that
UPLIFTS, or allows for an uplifting of the surrounding
environment. The perfect form central to a town or any cherished
endeavour in India is the MODEL TO EMULATE, to GROW INTO.
In the Auroville Matrimandir we have just the contrary. We have a
flawed, imperfect and deceptive form with no redeeming features. This
is the focus not only of that community’s life but it has imposed
itself and become the focus of the Sri Aurobindo Ashram as well, and
has spread throughout the world via the numerous ‘centres’ connected to
these establishments that have sprung up everywhere. All are part of a
web woven from this central symbol-form. Most caught in
this web are Indians. The confusion is so great that they reject their own
millennia-old tradition in favour of the Auroville theory that the
Matrimandir ‘cannot be perfect because we are not perfect’. The flaws
and distortions, if indeed they are there, are justified on the basis
of a sanction established in 1974 for the community by Satprem on
various occasions but particularly in his letter to ‘D’, dated 12
September 1974. We will quote from this letter further on because it
entered MAC archives on 5. 2. 2003, sent to us by Paulette in defence
of the Auroville Matrimandir.
Next
Page
1
2
3
4
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7bcd/c7bcd01c25a6718f7535fb5ae4830600cc5005fc" alt="" |
|